Feedback welcome

Feel free to leave a comment. If it is interesting, I will publish it.

10/08/2020

VP Debate -- Who Won?

For 90 minutes last night Kamala Harris and Mike Pence did a stunning job of NOT answering the thoughtful questions posed by the moderator, USA journalist Susan Page.   Clearly, both candidates had been coached intensely and they were well prepared with the points they wanted to make.  

That Pence is adept at ducking questions was not surprising , but I expected more from Kamala - who was impressively on-point at the nominating debates.   

I only lasted 20 minutes before I had to leave the room, frustrated with  both candidates for boringly reiterating well worn accusations and talking points.    When asked what discussions she had had with Biden about succession, Harris gave us an autobiographical review --proudly noting  that she was the first woman of color to accomplish her accomplishments. (Ho-hum).  The most interesting thing about Pence apparently was a fly that was trying to lay eggs on his head.  (I did not see that live, because I was already playing Words With Friends on the computer with other bored escapees.)

I'm pretty sure nobody changed their minds, same as the Presidential debate  shouting match.  So the winner of the debate  IMHO was probably Pence, because I predicted that she would eat his lunch.  In the end he still had his baloney sandwich intact. If you are a progressive you probably thought Kamala won because she repeated all the stuff you wanted to hear.

It really doesn't matter, anyhow, since I have already voted, and dropped off the ballots at the Town Hall collection box.  You?


 

#ByDon

10/06/2020

Quo Vadimus?


The other day I had a discussion with an old High School classmate, who supports Trump's re-election. He dreads the thought of another liberal democrat in the White House.  He frames the contest as a fundamental choice between socialism (Biden-Harris) and capitalism (Trump and the other guy.)

 I said that it is more likely that we are heading towards Autocracy rather than Capitalism if Trump gets re-elected. He shows all the signs of a budding dictator:

  • Raising the specter that he might not consider the election as legitimate (if he loses),
  • rallying his followers to vague action, 
  • making up stuff about ballots tossed in rivers  
  • stoking fear that cities will burn if Biden is elected.  
  • Repeating Nationalist propaganda pretending to be patriotism.
  • Blaming immigrants and foreign powers for all ills. 
  • Dumbing down the message to the least educated and most impressionable segment of society.
  • Discrediting the Press if they print any criticism.  
  • Being cozy with Hate groups.  
  • Purging from the government positions anyone who might provide real  oversight and transparency.  
  • Spreading misinformation and lies.  

When  Joe Biden gets elected president, the economy will be as strong as ever.  Kamala is not  AOC.  Joe is not Bernie.  I would agree that  there is a trope towards social democracy similar to some countries in western Europe. but that's not the end of the world as far as I'm concerned.  Universal health care is not an evil goal.  Affordable education seems like a good idea.   There is no plan to raise taxes on anyone earning less than $400K per year.    Canada has universal health care and free college tuition.  They seem to have a thriving economy.

When people like Trump and Jeff Bezos,  and big profitable corporations can get away not paying any taxes there's something wrong with unrestrained Capitalism.   We are  already dangerously close to being an Oligarchy -- with the real strings of power being pulled by obscenely rich patrons of politicians.  

I prefer to think that America can help people who are less fortunate and without compromising anyone's ability to become financially successful, and I believe that will continue.  I don't know of any  popular push to totally eliminate wealth.  Moderate Liberals just want to have the wealthy pay more than they do now.   Don't forget,  they used to have a very high tax on wealth during the Go-Go years of the fifties, sixties and seventies and  this high earner tax rate in 1980 was 70% .  Those higher rates  didn't eliminate wealth and I don't think it will in the future. 

So the election is not about Capitalism vs Socialism; rather it is about Democracy vs Autocracy.


8/29/2020

A Few Thoughts on Election Integrity

 Having worked at the polls as a sworn Inspector for the past 15 or so years, I can attest to the fact that everyone I've worked with at the polls takes election integrity very seriously.   We are committed to a fair process that allows every registered voter to have their vote counted.  

Recently, a certain president has made an effort to discredit elections that he might not win. (Don't forget in 2016, he lost several GOP state primary contests and immediately labeled them "rigged." )  

While I'm aware of historical efforts to "buy" election, and rare cases of ballot tampering, elections in this country and this state (Mass.) are reliably managed  by individuals who take the vow of neutrality seriously. 

The effort to discredit mail-in voting has been ramping-up.  The first issue is the registered voter database.  Critics have cited cases where the rolls still contain thousands of names of people who have died or moved away.  They say these are possible means of voter fraud.  They worry that someone could send mail-in ballots for these dead and gone people.  Except that's not what happens in real life.  Some states actually compare signatures on mailed-in ballots against registration signatures. Most of the horror stories that are shared on social media involve some conspiracy theory, easily believed by gullible partisans.  Very few actual cases have been proven. 

The penalties for tampering in an election are severe.  This dissuades most potential tamperer. 

I believe Trump has been tampering with the election process since he was nominated and even more so since he was inaugurated.   I will not be surprised when, after being soundly defeated in the coming the November election, Trump and some of his appointees are indicted for election tampering.    This time he will not have a claque of enabling senators to save him. 

Secret ballot.  Some have raised the question of mail-in ballots not being secret.  Again, in my experience poll workers are sworn to maintain secrecy.  Typically, absentee ballots were aggregated as received, and not opened until voting day, when the Warden would feed the ballots into the voting machine, only examining a ballot if there was a malfunction (e.g. mis-marking of the ballot, causing it to be rejected).  Sometimes a voter will have their ballot rejected by the machine.  The Warden will always ask for permission to look at the ballot to determine the problem.  If the voter says "No," the problem ballot is destroyed and a new blank ballot is issued.  I am not sure how they do this in places where there is not a paper ballot.

Provisional ballots.  These are ballots that are given to people who show-up to vote but are not on the rolls.  At the discretion of the Warden, a ballot may be issued but is not tabulated until the claim of the voter can be reviewed/cross checked.  (In practice, there are only  handful of provisional ballots and are counted only if they could affect the outcome, say, in a recount situation)

Ballot Harvesting.  I think this is a recent concern stemming from the recent changes to allow large numbers of mail-in (versus "absentee") ballots.  Ballot Harvesting is when a third party (other than a relative or postal worker) collects ballots to deliver to a polling place.  Massachusetts does not address the legality of this practice, but it does seem open to possible abuse, and I would support making ballot collecting or harvesting illegal. 

Due to the pandemic, I will  not be working the in-person polls this November, but I feel confident that the results will not be "rigged."

8/23/2020

Pop Quiz


"Thin-skinned, self-obsessed, small-minded, intellectually lazy, and ill-disciplined" Who is the first person to pop into your head?


6/17/2020

Plague Notes June 2020

 


During normal times, a few of us regulars would routinely gather our favorite Irish pub on Monday afternoons.  We would sit elbow-to-elbow at the bar to trade stories or chat about world events while quaffing a few pints.   Someone got the bright idea to call it "Book Club." 

Instead of telling our wives "I'm going to have a few beers with the guys," and getting The Look, we would say. "Off to Book Club." Now, who could scowl at such a noble endeavor?  Ironically, we are all active book readers, so in fact, the conversation often does turn to books that we've recently read.  No in-depth analysis of themes or symbolism; just a few words to describe how we liked it.  Thumbs up or thumbs down -- end of discussion.  Back to the news.

This is one of the routines I have missed most during the lockdown.  So we have decided to convene Book Club in the safety of my back yard, weather permitting.  This is our new normal:  Bring your favorite drink and sit at a safe social distance.   Sorry, I don’t provide chicken wings. The rest room is over there -- behind the shed.

3/30/2020

A few thoughts about Conservatives vs Progressives




Conservatives vs Progressives

CONS: 
Penchant for name calling.
Likes simple explanations.
Easily swayed by lies & right wing memes.
Mis-informed and doesn't care, devoid of empathy for others.
Afraid of camels noses and slippery slopes
Watches Fox for information and MSNBC to find out what the evil left is thinking.
Believes abortion is murder when strangers do it.
Thinks of the 2nd amendment as a gun permit
Never sacrificed anyone or anything.  Wants others to fight for American eminence.
Justifies cheating because "everyone is cheating"
Refuses to believe in "Global warming"


PROGS:

Respects other views, except Conservatives who are evil.
Able to see complex causes for current crises, questions absolutes.
Is skeptical about biased sources, but believes NYT
Often the smartest person in the room. Empathetic but intolerant of idiots who disagree.
Likes skiing and camel riding
Watches you tube reruns of Daily Show and SNL
Values the sanctity of all sentient life. Believes life starts with a breath.
Wants to limit access to people-killing devices by nutjobs.
Served in Military when country needed him. Hates war.
Believes that all cheating is wrong, feels guilty about underpayment of taxes.
Doesn't need a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowin'

4/12/2019

Why Rooms are Important - an anti open space screed


Inner Spaces

I don't like the open space concept for living spaces.
I like rooms, with doors.
The living area should not smell like fried onions
I need a place to nap, to read, to write, to fart
without being watched and heard.

We have doors on bathrooms and bedrooms
for good reasons.


I might as well live in a studio apartment
where I would never lose my keys.

3/15/2019

We See What we Want to See


Since my famous departure from social media last year, I have been doing more reading than writing.  I had to confront the unpleasant truth that virtually no one was reading my blog, and Facebook was becoming little more than an enormous waste of time.   No one else was writing anything but shrill partisan politics, bad haiku, or cute pet pics.

After being off Facebook for almost a year - I deleted my account  March 2018 -  I have lost the  need/will to connect with others by constant updates.   Now when I want to talk to others, I send an email, or rarely, call them on the telephone. (I don't use my mobile device for phone calls except when I am in the car where Bluetooth handles calls via verbal commands.)

So, today, I return to the fold to a new beginning.  I am hopeful that I will be soon reporting the ongoing end of the Trump presidency, and the foolishness his election in 2016 mean't for this country.

Watched the Cohen hearing last week.  The hearing was not about Russia collusion. Cohen stated early on that he had "no direct evidence" of collusion with Russia. But he suspected that there was indeed some questionable contact beyond the hush money payoff that may have affected the outcome of the election. 

He was as credible as an inveterate liar and crook can be.
He is guilty of serious crimes and so his motives are suspect.  Is he making stuff up to get a more lenient sentence?  Is he seeking revenge for not getting a white house office?  We don't know for sure whether his claim to seek redemption is sincere or just another pack of lies.

Whatever his motive, Cohen's testimony sure seems aimed at taking Trump down.  There were several allusions to the ongoing grand jury investigations in the Southern District of NY.   Apparently they are looking into pre-election goings-on.

I don't think those investigations are relevant to any future impeachment efforts -- at least in my opinion.  Stuff that happened before the election should not be considered grounds for impeachment.  I always felt that way about Al Franken.  No one ever accused him of acting inappropriately as a Senator, and I was mystified that he resigned over some comparatively minor  #metoo infractions which occurred during his career when he was an entertainer.  (My spidey sense thinks that there were may have been a threat of more embarrassing revelations that he wished to squelch.  Perhaps we'll never know...)

Back to the Cohen House Committee hearing, each Republican member seemed solely interested in discrediting the witness. (The Repubicans behaved just as crassly partisan as the Democrats did at the Kavanaugh hearings. A pox on both!)  Not one of them was interested in the allegations against Trump and his cadre.  No one tried to defended Trump either,  except one white dude who said he had never heard the President use the "N- word."




10/21/2018

Halloween

Again this year, we will not go to any trouble to decorate since the neighborhood kids already think of our place as "The Haunted House."  
Reportedly, the previous owners were slain in their beds by an escaped homicidal lunatic with a hook for a hand.  Parents and kids, hooked to death.   The crime scene was so gory that the county coroner resigned the next day.  

Sometimes at night when I get up to go to the bathroom I see dead people - the ghosts of the kids with bloody hook marks... well, you don't really want to know the details.  

But the ghosts really spook the cats sometimes.  Cats have a special connection with the spirit world.  Come to think of it, the tragedy happened around Halloween back in 1995.  The murderer was never caught and some people think it might have been a vampire.

Hey what's that?   Something seems to be scratching at the door... Oh no.  Its a daemon or something.  Smells like rotting flesh.  Big teeth.  Wants to drink my blood.  I know, silver bullets in gun.  Load.  Cock.  Fire.  Bang, Bang ..Eek,   Argh,  (silence).

Hi.  this is the vampire, the poor pale shmuck is lying, drained and lifeless, on the rug.  Just for the record, silver bullets only kill werewolves.   Hahahahahahahahaahahaha! 

10/18/2018

Carpe Autumn

There is nothing as magic as an early morning stroll under a bright New England sky in October. The crisp, moist air hangs like golden wisps of smoke, whispering ripe apples and pumpkins.
Emily Dickinson found the slant of light on winter afternoons to be oppressive, but for me the hue and angle of the light in autumn is a tonic for the soul.
Yes, you can feel the promise of frost in the damp air and the dew glistening on the grass. One night, very soon, the tomato vines and marigold leaves will turn black. We will pull them up and toss them on the compost pile.

Though we will sorely miss the freshly picked tomatoes for our salads and homemade salsa, and we will long for the luxury of golden pungent marigolds in vases, we will not mourn their passing.   We are already thinking of the spring planting and renewal.
Perhaps it is the knowledge that we only have a few precious weeks to savor the fruits of our cultivation makes us appreciate them more. And we dare to look ahead with hope to the inevitable Spring
We who love the change of seasons welcome Autumn, and in turn, Winter. We do not carp about weather. We celebrate the changes in the skies.  We carpe the diem.
You will not hear us complaining about the rain or the heat or even the hurricane. We take what comes, knowing that, if there is a God, then it is His will.  Despite our prayers or wishes or puny technology we have no power over weather – we can only try to endure.
You may hear us remark that the lawn is brown or the snow is too deep to go to work.  These are not complaints they are merely observations.  We are Buddhists.  We cannot make the weather happen.  We can only sit and hunker down when the winds blow, and wait for the lovely days.
This is life.  Because the earth is off-kilter, we have seasons.  They say the earth has a constant temperature at the depth six feet.  Lord knows we will have plenty of time for that.

9/07/2018

Labor Day 2018


 Although I am no longer a member of the paid workforce, I welcome the long Labor Day holiday as the unofficial end of summer.   The mere act of flipping the page in my calendar to September evokes the hope of fall harvest, football, apples, vibrant colors.

The nights are already getting cooler.  Acorns hang in fat clusters on my neighbor's oak trees.  In my side yard, a red-tailed hawk  can't get off the ground with the fat carcass of the rabbit it just killed.  As the hawk sullenly pecks at the carcass.  I silently cheer -- one less rabbit gnawing on the hostas.  I hope the hawk returns to feast on other fat rabbits, tasty squirrels and chunky chipmunks that have menaced my garden all summer.  

It has been a long hot, dry summer.    



8/14/2018

Repost of a remembrance - 11 years later



Remembering Woodstock 1969

Note This was previously posted 8/14/2009

Man, who could forget that moment in history, forty years ago, when we gathered, half a million strong, for those few days of Peace, Love and Music? 

OK, so maybe I was not there, but I heard about it on the radio. Hey, my wife and I had jobs in those days; responsibilities - rent, careers, and a baby on-the-way.

It was actually a memorable summer for us - but, not because of any music concert. In July we had taken a cruise to Bermuda as a sort of delayed honeymoon. We were young, clean cut, and had never heard of Jimmi Hendrix or Janis Joplin. We were still under the musical influence of Bobby Darren and The Kingston Trio. 

The gathering at Woodstock would never have appeared on our radar. We were trying to break-in, not drop-out. We did not even know anyone that did drugs or practiced free love.

One of my musical memories of that summer was driving through the Sumner Tunnel in Boston and hearing an unfamiliar but haunting song that was playing loudly on someone's 8-track tape. (In those days there was no radio reception in the tunnels). The vocal harmony was magnetic and thrilling to me, but I did not recognize the artists. 

It was only when the Woodstock movie came out, I was able to identify the group and the song - "Judy Blue Eyes" by Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young. Ok, I know what you are thinking, I was out of touch. So sue me.

When the story came out about Woodstock - 3 days of sharing close proximity with masses of drugged out hippies who had not bathed recently, dancing in the mud and blocking other people's view of the stage, standing in line for the few porta-potties with 399,000 other bursting bladders, I was secretly glad that I was not there. 

I say 'secretly', because as I later discovered everyone thought you were cool if you could claim to have been there. Only a clueless dolt would admit that a) he didn't go and b) did not regret missing it.

Most of the performers at Woodstock are probably dead by now, if not forgotten. And, most of the attendees who survived the drugs and free love would be at the age where they are in or close to retirement. For me, it is hard to believe that forty years have passed like an express train in the night.


7/28/2018

Let's Talk About Free Speech

If I was the Emperor, I would prohibit demonstrations that inconvenience innocent people.

The right of Free speech does not mean freedom to impede the movement of others.  People who protest by blocking traffic are wrong-headed.  They may get attention, but I submit that most of the attention is anger, not support for their cause.

Sit-ins may galvanize the choir but I don't believe such actions will change anyone's mind.  My personal research indicates that just the opposite effect occurs.  People who are inconvenienced harden their opposition to the cause and the group that created the inconvenience.

I see blocking traffic as a form of terrorism.  Just like when a bomb explodes in a pizza joint or speeding truck intentionally running into holiday shoppers in a crowded square, the ones who are most harmed are innocent of the injuries that are supposed by the terrorist group..   Instead of having the guts to confront the real object of the anguish, the protester takes his anger out on anyone who happens to be in the wrong place. These "soft targets" are attractive to cowards who lack the guts to face their real oppressors.

Darwin tells us that a person whose calculus is to inconvenience others to get attention for his cause will likely pass these traits along to subsequent offspring.  In a few generations we will have nothing but chaos. 

Thus we need to nip the problem in the bud. Therefore, a modest proposal:  Shoot the protesters in the groin, arrest the survivors and remove their reproductive organs..


What do you Think?

7/21/2018

Peevish

I'm feeling a bit peevish this morning.

#1  In Massachusetts, the law states that pedestrians in a crosswalk have the right of way, and autos must stop to let the walkers finish crossing.  I do not have any problem with this law.

The right of way does not apply to people standing on the sidewalk waiting to cross.  And it does not empower idiots to step into a crosswalk when there is a car approaching at 35 miles per hour, forcing the driver of said car to jam on the brakes.  

#2 Breakdown Lane Travel.  On many roads in this state, travel is allowed in the breakdown lane during certain periods.  I'm not sure what the poor souls who actually have broken-down are supposed to do, but there have been cases where they have been killed by motorists tearing down the breakdown lane at 60 or 70 mph.

  I have a simple solution to this problem.  Amend the law to limit the speed in the breakdown lane to not exceed 30 mph.  That would alleviate the bottleneck situation, would keep cars from speeding past you in the right-most lane, not to mention that it would diminish the likelihood of a crash with a disabled vehicle legitimately occupying the breakdown lane.

#3 Why am I paying for a land line?   20 times a day the phone rings and caller id says "Unavailable" or some other label that does not identify the caller.  If I don't recognize the name, I do not pick up. but it is still annoying.  Many are robocalls that leave a message on the answering machine, and I have to delete them.  Verizon should offer an option to block calls from going to the answering machine, also I am the do-not-call list, which seems to be a joke as I am getting calls from known scammers and spammers.  Verizon is not looking out for me, and I resent it.

#4  I have a big screen TV.  Why do Netflix disks insist on showing movies in letterbox format ( the previews are full-screen, so don't tell me that it's the TV's fault.  I hate when I see the message that "That option is not available" when I want to skip ahead so I don't need to view the anti piracy messages in six languages.


4/27/2018

Notes from God's Diary


Creating a universe is pretty easy if you know what you’re doing.

Despite what they say, I am not going to raise dead bodies; (what would be the point of that?)

I do not like burnt offerings.

People are like ants; they have a spirit but do not possess a soul.

The main reason I created humans is to watch them fight.

There is no heaven, but Hell is real.

All evangelists are going to hell. 

3/28/2018

Monday Morning Quarterback



More than a year has now passed since the unfortunate election of Donald Trump.  I was a Bernie fan, and not enamored with Hillary. I believe the outcome of the November 2016 election would have been different if Bernie had been The Democratic candidate.   I, along with most pundits, was expecting someone other than Trump to be the Republican nominee. 

I think I could have voted for someone like Ohio Governor John Kasich instead of Hillary. But, as it turned-out, I was stuck with a choice between two candidates, neither of whom had my trust or admiration.  One was a self-promoting reality show producer with a checkered history.  The other was a political insider with a considerable albatross factor. 

I voted for the second worst candidate. But the worst one won. 

In hindsight, I think Trump got nominated and elected for the simple reason that he was the least boring of the presidential hopefuls. And, he has not been boring in office.   He has been the most un-presidential of presidents.  (I don't think I need to expand on this point.)

And here we are March 2018 – more divided than ever.  

Somehow, the major political parties have convinced the public -- and especially the media -- that we are concerned with the same tired topics:  Abortion, Gun rights, Immigration.

In fact, most of us are not lying awake at night worrying about access to abortion, or whether we have the right to shoot at the squirrels in our back yards, or whether every fruit picker is a citizen.

We are more worried about corrupt politicians, crime, id theft and illness. We are afraid that if we (god forbid) have to go to the hospital we might end up sicker than when we went in.  We hate the traffic that clogs our highways and the inhuman conditions of air travel.  

We are awakened at ungodly hours by honking horns, barking dogs, gas-powered leaf-blowers and idling diesel truck engines.  Our quality of life is assailed by commercial interests and thoughtless neighbors.

We are saddened that so many of our elected officials are bought-and-paid-for by special interests, that they remain in office mainly to enrich themselves, leaving our most needy of our citizens to live in squalor.

Our food is prepared by the least-educated, least-hygienic people the restaurant can hire.  We can’t buy cigarettes, but Wendy’s can sell a two-pound hamburger.

Everything that we want to have or do is taxed.  Companies can lie about the price of their product with an asterisk (because that is the “base” price that does not include fees, taxes, usage charges, royalties, and all manner of additional add-ons that can double the cost of the thing.)

President Trump still acts like he is running a reality show. America is not greater, and we are annoyed.


3/24/2018

Yes I quit Facebook and Twitter

Am I a Trend setter?

Not to brag, but I have always been a stalwart defender of truth, justice and the American way. No wait., that was Superman.  Not me.  

Well, it's been said that I march to the beat of my own drum, but I'll have to admit that this is not necessarily a choice, but more likely because I am rhythmically retarded.  I am fated to be out of step with my fellow marchers. I can't help it.  At least I can sing on key.

My decision to shut-off Facebook and Twitter has been percolating for some time.  Most intelligent folks would agree that Social Media is in general a huge, but benevolent, waste of time.  But, most regular users concede that it is also a convenient medium for exchanging photos and items of interest among family members and real friends.  The really smart users probably limit their exposure to a few chosen individuals.  

But most of us, seeking 'free' entertainment are seduced into expanding our 'friends' circle to include friends-of-friends and even the dreaded 'public' (ie, anyone).   As time goes by, we are drawn into seemingly innocent exchanges of information - fun surveys, tests, startling videos, cute pet photos, petition drives, affinity groups, you name it.  What we haven't really given much thought to is how much information we are giving away through seemingly harmless participation.

Recent revelations have made it clear that Social Media is far from a benevolent waste of time.  Rather it has become an industry that crawls up your ass and into your brain and shares all the information it learned about you along the way -- with total strangers, and without your knowledge.  (You consented by agreeing to the fine print in their terms and conditions of use).   So, when you were answering the questions to determine your Leprechaun name, or answering the Mensa quiz or clicking on the discount K-Y Jelly ad, they were gathering information about your preferences, your education level, your political ideology, etc.

We are not just talking about Facebook.  There are many other sites that do the same thing.  And the big search engines (Google, Microsoft, AOL) collude to sell data about what you have searched for -- refrigerators, hats, male enhancement products, medicines, cat litter...  

I have been feeling a growing discontent with the silliness of much of the content that was being presented to me. Frankly, I don't care about where you went for lunch or what it looked like, or 10 photos of you standing in front of a cathedral in France (which you posted to make me jealous).  I don't care about your cute cat, and even less about your precocious grand kid, and I especially don't care about the squirrel that is raiding your bird feeder, but thanks for sharing.

So, after learning about the thousands of fake Facebook accounts set up by Russian operatives to influence the 2016 election, and then more recently hearing about the data breach by Cambridge Analytics, I decided that I could live without Facebook --which for me was a colossal waste of time invested for the amount of entertainment enjoyed.  I also deleted my Twitter account.   A big problem with these platforms is that there is no editor.

Anyone can say anything in the name of free speech regardless of how inane or wrong they are.   If you like that type of chaos, you are welcome to it.  I'll  pass.

I have not missed it.  I'm even thinking of updating my blog on a regular basis. 

Don't laugh, it could happen..


7/01/2017

Getting Older

Well, I have passed another milestone.  

I arrived at age 75 the other day.  Achieved didn't seem to be the right word, since achievement is commonly defined as "a goal being reached by effort, skill or courage."  In my case, I kind of snuck-up on it, by merely surviving.  

I did not plan to live this long.  Life expectancy for my cohort --males born in 1942 -- was age 68.  My dad died at age 64, and none of his three brothers lived past age 65.  So I went through middle-age believing that Noonan men could count themselves lucky to enjoy a year or two of retirement.

That's why I took early retirement (ie started collecting Social Security) at age 62.

But here is the thing about life expectancy: From birth, the actuaries have to factor-in the average rate of demise for those who will succumb to accidents, war, disaster, infectious disease and other threats to life.  Assuming you don't wrap the family car around  a tree on prom night or drown in the lake, there is a raft of fatal diseases that strike during young adulthood and middle age years.  But if you survive until age 65, there is a new calculation. Suddenly, you get a reprieve of another 18 years.  Now, the new life expectancy age for my cohort is 83.

Eighty-three seems old to me.   My new goal is trying to achieve that age.  This time, it will be a deliberate objective; I will not sneak-up on it, I will arrive on a band wagon drawn by a team of six Clydesdale.   Well, you get the idea -- I will apply effort, skill and courage to get there.

I think it will take a lot of effort to stay upright, to keep moving and be as flexible as possible.  Gravity is an enemy of age, it keeps trying to pull us down.  I plan to reduce my body mass significantly to lessen gravity's effects on knees and joints.  

It will take skill as well; the brain wants to shrink, to erase memories, to shut down -- just when we need it the most.  We can't let that happen.  We must encourage our own curiosity, caring,  and social interaction just when it is easier to sit in front of the TV like zombies watching  Jeopardy, The Kardashians or NCIS.    We need to keep reading, doing crosswords, challenging mental acuity by debating those who disagree with us.  

It will take courage -  I like the definition: "Strength in the face of pain or grief."   We need to keep a perspective on ourselves and the world, recognize those emotional triggers and fears which are the meat of media "news".  We need to stay positive,  and to stay funny.  A sense of humor is indispensable.   

Frankly, I have given-up on questions like "Why are we here?"  "Is there an afterlife?"  I  can accept that my life may have no more meaning than a crow's. 
Just the same, both the crow and I want to stay alive as long as possible.


6/28/2017

No More Trolling

Sometimes I get tired of trolling my friend George's blog.  You should click that link if you haven't heard enough about how Barack Obama personally ruined the country.  

I know what you are thinking:  I'm too lazy to write in my own blog.  OK, maybe a little.  I admit that it is a lot easier to troll someone else's cockeyed view of things than to come up with readable factual statements about the state of affairs.  Besides that, I am frankly too cynical to believe that anyone in public office is looking out for the citizens.

Besides no more that two or three people are likely to read this blog, so why bother to write and edit a piece that no one reads?

  Or if they do click on it they just scan for tidbits so they can write snarky comments.

One of my more progressive friends recently asked "How you can stay  friends with someone who thinks Trump is (despite acknowledged flaws) is the right man to Commander in Chief?"

  I answer, isn't that what friends are for? Standing by someone, even when you think they are wrong?

Our values are not so different

We agree that America is great, especially if you were born lucky: good looking, smart parents, etc.
We agree that people ought to work for a living.
We are wary of our fellow men many of whom are selfish, dishonest and ignorant.
We are kind to animals and respectful of our elders (of which there are fewer every year)
We don't cheat, steal or take advantage of our fellow citizens.
We distrust any advertisement that has fine print or and asterisk after the word free.
We are suspicious of strangers.  We tend to like individuals, but not mobs.

I could go on for hundreds more points of agreement, but you get the idea.  My point is that political disagreements are really temporal, emotional, and, in most cases, theoretical.  Why these differences of opinion have become so divisive is a mystery to me. 

Most people I know on both ends of the spectrum have a lot in common: they are not going to have an abortion, they do not walk around with loaded semi-automatic weapons and large capacity ammunition clips.  They don't burn flags in protest.  People should use toilets that are appropriate to their plumbing.   They think that immigrants should come here legally and pay taxes.  They think vicious criminals should be punished commensurate to the crimes they commit.   

So, why are we so polarized on these issues, when it is clear that neither political party really cares about the citizenry, but is only incented by the donations of lobbyists and rich partisans?

6/17/2017

Who is Looking Out For US?

Yesterday,  President Trump announced his plan to reverse the recent thawing of US relations with Cuba that began under the Obama administration. And that strategy seemed to be working for both sides.    

Trump justifies his new sanctions as being in the interests of Cuban citizens who are still oppressed by the Castro regime.   It's nice to know that our dear leader is looking out for the interests of the oppressed Cubans.  But, reversing the relaxed access and trade that has been benefiting small businessmen in both Cuba and US does not seem be a promising strategy.  Let's remember, sanctions didn't accomplish anything during the past 50 years.  The Castros are perfectly willing to stonewall these sanctions to maintain dictatorial control.

Most Americans now believe that improved access to Cuba is in the interests of both country's citizens, helping the economy of both trading partners.    

My wife opined that Trump is a "Manchurian Candidate."   He is taking steps to stifle any investigation of Russian influence while at the same time applying policies that will create a vacuum in Cuba that will be readily occupied by the Russians.  90 Miles form Florida.

Scary thought.  Now with Bill Riley gone, who is looking out for us?

6/13/2017

Melting

After the gluttonous River Boat vacation in April, and the attendant gain in poundage,  Judy and I decided to sign-up for Weight Watchers.    

So we did that 2 weeks ago.  Since then we have become super-aware of what we are eating (and drinking).  So far, I have dropped about 10 lbs, mainly by adhering to the plan, counting what they call "smartpoints" -- every item of food is assigned a point value based on the combined amount of saturated fat, sugar, protein and calories.  A serving of chicken is 2 points, a beer is 5 points, Gin and diet tonic is 3 points.   A slice of pizza is 8 points. We have given up pizza and fried foods for a while.   

The higher point items are most processed foods, oils, butter, mayonnaise, pastries, deserts, sauces, potato chips, and restaurant foods -- often because of portion size.    I'm allowed 40 points a day and there is a weekly bonus award (about 40 points) for moments that are too good to pass up.  So if I can be physically active (which I have been), reduce portion size, generally follow point guidelines, I can have several beers or cocktails every day and not feel deprived -- and still lose weight.  All vegetables and all fruits are zero points and unlimited quantities are allowed.  So if I am hungry I can always fill-up on salad or eat an apple.

Don't worry, I haven't got religion!  I'll not harangue anyone about dieting, but I just wanted to let you know what is going on, in case you notice some shrinkage and mistake it for AIDS or other wasting disease.   
 
They say any diet works for the first few weeks, mainly because you start to pay attention to what you are eating.  It's already getting a bit exhausting to plan every meal and snack, counting every teaspoon of dressing or other high calorie substance.  

So we'll see how long we last.  It helps that we are both doing it, so we have banned any unhealthy items from the fridge/lardor.  

(Also, Gin and diet tonic ain't so bad with fresh lime.  ) 
 

3/04/2017

Disturbing Patterns


Just finished "In The Garden of Beasts" (2011) by Erik Larson.  Historical nonfiction is not my usual reading fare, but Larson's "Dead Wake" was so engrossing that I thought I'd give this one a shot. Larson is a master at writing a story that keeps you turning the page, even though you already know how it ends.

This story is set in 1933 Berlin.  William Dodd has been appointed by President Roosevelt as the US Ambassador to Germany.  He arrives in Berlin with wife and two adult children, completely unprepared for the changes that are already taking place.  Through letters and diaries, we get first hand accounts of the systematic dismantling of a vibrant, civilized society by Hitler and his cohorts.

One of goals of the Third Reich was to control the newspapers. Hitler and his senior staff launched a campaign to discredit and shut down unfavorable news.  Fear was a major weapon in keeping the truth about the human rights abuses (mainly inflicted on Jews and "undesirables") from getting-out to the world.  

Jews were methodically isolated and maligned.  Before 1933, the German intellectual and finance community was dominated by Jews. They were the perfect scapegoat for the economic problems that was afflicting all of Europe.   By the end of 1933,  Jews were forbidden to work for Newspapers, government jobs and most other influential positions in Germany.

By the end of 1934, Hitler was named Fuher.  Things did not get better.

I am not the first or only one to notice what is going on in the USA today.  I hear similar threats and blaming from our president.  The fake news, The media is "the enemy of the people" (a favorite Stalin phrase).

An article in the Ideas section of the 2-19-2017 edition of The Boston Globe (  "Will The Media Be Crushed?" by Martha Bayles) addresses the current sentiment expressed by the Trump administration -- that the media is "dishonest." The irony of the kettle calling the pot black is seemingly lost on many observers on the right.

I think dishonest is the wrong word.  The media is not about facts anymore.  The media is about entertainment. And money.    Journalism is not what it was when I was in college.  We took courses in Investigative Journalism that emphasized the who-what-when-where- and why of the news.  This isn't the case anymore.  The line between "news", "analysis" and "opinion" has become fuzzy.  We were taught to report the facts with objective neutrality.  Value laden terms or opinions were only valid when in quotes, spoken by a source.  You can hardly find a story today that doesn't contain the bias of the author.

Many so-called breaking news stories reveal zero facts.  A breathless reporter stands in front of a building, preferably a burning apartment building.  "Something may (or may not) happened and we are the first to bring it to you live on (or near) the scene !  More details at 11." 

The average American, if he even exists, is skeptical of the news, especially news that forces one to rethink their current beliefs. While we blithely accept the evil that the opponent ideologies wallow in, we are reluctant to accept the notion that our idols may also be flawed.

We must remember that in 1930's Germany, the most educated and successful citizens were not Nazis.  It was the less educated, less hopeful masses who joined the Nazis in blaming others for their misery.  Much like Trump today, who appeals to the least-informed among us. 
.








2/07/2017

Unintended Consequences: How Xenophobia boosted China's Rocket Program

This content was published on the Public Radio WGBH site
( The story was compelling enough to copy. It tells how McCarthy era fear-mongering caused the USA to  deport one of our most valued scientists, who went on to become the father of China's rocket program. )


Fear can lead to dumb decisions. 
And that could be an unintended consequence of US President Donald Trump’s ban on travel and immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries, according to Peter W. Singer of the New America Foundation. 
  
There are legitimate security concerns when it comes to deciding who to allow entry into the US from places like Syria and Iraq. That is why rigorous vetting procedures are already in place for asylum seekers from war-torn countries. 
“It’s a two-year process. It involves all sorts of different things from background checks to fingerprints to iris scans, you name it,” Singer says. 
Singer notes, however, that the framing of Trump’s executive order is about the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 — even though the home countries of the 9/11 plotters aren't included in the ban. 
If this executive order had been put into place back in 2001, it would not have stopped either 9/11 or any single act of terror in the United States that has occurred since,” Singer says. 
Take the case of Qian Xuesen, a Chinese scientist Singer recently wrote about in Popular Science.  
Qian was born in China in 1911 and came to the United States in 1935 to study aeronautical engineering at MIT. He later took a job with the US government and worked on several programs, including ballistic missile technology and the Manhattan Project, the secret atomic bomb program. 
In 1949, Qian was named director of the jet propulsion lab at Cal Tech. Singer says Qian earned a reputation for being an undisputed genius. 
But in that same year, Mao Zedong’s communists took over mainland China. Soon after that came Sen. Joe McCarthy's Red Scare, a witch hunt targeting suspected communist sympathizers in the US. 
Singer says Qian’s attendance at a party held before the war was used to implicate him as a communist sympathizer and a security threat. The FBI apparently believed that the social gathering was organized by communists from Pasadena, California. 
“Solely for the fact that he attends this party, his application for US citizenship is denied. ... [Qian] then loses his security clearance, and then he’s placed under house arrest,” Singer says. 
The Chinese scientist was held in detention for four years, and then deported back to China in 1955. 
The head of the US Navy at the time was quoted as saying that Qian’s deportation was "the stupidest thing this country ever did. He was no more a communist than I was and we forced him to go.” 
Back in China, Qian went on to become a national hero who helped make great strides in China’s nascent nuclear, missile and space programs. 
“Over the next couple of decades, [Qian] becomes known as the ‘father of Chinese rocketry,’” Singer says.
In fact, Qian helped develop the long-range missiles that still target the US today, Singer says, along with the Chinese nuclear program. 
Singer sees Qian’s story as a powerful example of how fear of outsiders in the short term can end up backfiring on your own nation’s security. 
“We lost one of the top scientific minds of the last century that had already contributed greatly to US security and was clearly going to contribute more,” Singer says. 
“Then in turn we helped jump start this vast [Chinese] missile and space complex that’s still a rival to us today.”  
Not every scientist or university student being blocked from entry to the US by Trump’s executive order is going to make the same kind of impact that Qian did, of course. 
“But each and every one of them will be a story of lost opportunity,” Singer says.  

Attribution: https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-02-06/us-trained-scientist-was-deported-then-became-father-chinese-rocketry


1/25/2017

Headlines and alternative facts

Random Thoughts

- Trump just signed an order to with hold funding from foreign non-profits that offer abortion counseling.  This is typical of shallow Pro-Life thinking.  If they considered the consequences of their actions they might see that many of the babies that they insist must be born to live a life of poverty and strife will grow into the same adults that they want to throw in jail, keep out of the US, and off the welfare roles.

- It was reported that one of the last (classless) acts of the Obama administration was to authorize $220 Million to the terrorist Palestinian Authority, despite a GOP request to hold back those funds. Trump should claw-back those funds and give a refund to people like me who actually pay taxes.

- There has been a huge flap about how many people attended the Trump inauguration, and the subsequent handling of the "alternative facts" given to the press.  I think the Trump staff is right when they say that the liberal press taunted them with comparisons of the attendances at previous Obama inaugurations.  How could Trump not fire back with exaggerated claims of a million an and a half bodies as far as the eye could see?
   I chalk this up to "irrelevant information" designed by the TV news editors (on both sides) to fill time because they have nothing of substance to talk about.  These days every time I see a news show with more than two guests, I switch to Comedy Channel.  These goat rodeos with panels of 5 or 8 people are unwatchable and bereft of useful information.  Don Lemon is the worst.  He should be fired if for no other reason than being drunk on camera on New Years Eve.

- As he promised, Trump has acted to remove the block that Obama had put on the Keystone XL pipeline.  I think this is a bad idea.  Here are my reasons.

  • The pipeline is intended to bring Canadian oil to Texas for export..  
  • The shale oil that is being extracted is the least pure oil, accessed by fracking. 
  • Fracking uses a lot of fossil fuel to power the extraction engines. Thus it is much less efficient than other *available* sources of oil.  
  • Many of the involved private landowners and civil authorities in the path of the pipeline object for various reasons.
  • America is already independent of foreign oil.  This oil will be exported at low/crude tax rate to foreign refineries.
  • It is a short term jobs creator.  Admittedly, thousands will be employed to create the pipeline, but once finished less than a hundred permanent jobs will be created.  
  • Does does not lower fuel prices in the US. May actually result in regional increases. 
  • Accidents can and do happen.  This is a project that does not benefit 99.4% of Americans.
  • The only real beneficiaries of this project will be the Oil companies and construction companies involved.  
  • Check out my facts at:  https://www.nwf.org/pdf/Global-Warming/KXL_Myths_vs_Facts.pdf

      Who you gonna believe? The lying oil companies or the National Wildlife Federation?.



1/14/2017

English Majors Need Not Apply?

There was an article in yesterday's Boston Globe  about the plans at  a small NH college (Colby-Sawyer) to discontinue two major concentrations which were once thought to be the cornerstones of a Liberal Arts education:  English and Philosophy.  

I suppose this is a reflection of the relative level of interest in these fields.  The college reports that currently there are only 18 students majoring in English, and no Philosophy majors.  I guess it makes logical sense that parents who are looking at annual tuition costs of $54,000 per academic year, are urging their kids to choose more practical degrees that will translate into career opportunities later on. 

I am disappointed by the general assumption that Liberal Arts degrees are inferior to Science and Technology sheepskins -- largely because of the higher salary levels that engineers enjoy upon graduation.  

On the other hand,  I am pleased to report that there is a sparse but growing body of information that disputes the knee-jerk assumption that STEM graduates will outperform Liberal Arts majors in some critical jobs.  

One CEO admits: "Looking back at the tech teams that I’ve built at my companies, it’s evident that individuals with liberal arts degrees are by far the sharpest, best­-performing software developers and technology leaders. Often these modern techies have degrees in philosophy, history, and music – even political science..."

In another Wall Street Journal piece entitled: "Good News Liberal Arts Majors, Your Peers Probably Won't Outearn You Forever" 
Points to numerous examples of Liberal Arts majors whose salaries tend to close the gap and their careers mature.   Click on the article and take a look at the lifetime earning chart.  You might be surprised.

I should admit here that I graduated Northeastern University as an English Major.  Despite my inability to spell or punctuate correctly, I managed to come away from NU with one great asset - my wife of 49 years.  We met in Creative Writing class.  

Even in 1968, (unless you could write like Papa Hemingway)  there were few career paths for graduating English Majors.  You could go on for a degree in fine arts (MFA) and go into the publishing industry as an editor or proofreader. Or go to grad school for an MED so you could teach.  Or you could go out into the scary world of commerce as an administrative flunky.

Following a short stint in academic administration for my alma mater, I chose the latter road.  I worked for eight different companies in my career.  When applying for a job I always fibbed a bit on my resume/application.  Instead of English as my major, I would write English-Journalism because I thought it would make me seem more practical.  After all, I had taken a course in Investigative Reporting.   I guess it worked, because most of my working life I've been a Systems Analyst, Project Manager, Managed a Product Admin group, and was a even Program Manager for New Products Manufacturing, for goodness sake!  

You may ask how my degree in Liberal Arts/English prepared me for a career in High Tech companies.  Beats me!   I like to think that my Liberal Arts courses helped me to hone my analytical skills and communications abilities.  Luck plays a huge role in anyone's life.   (As a side note, I wish more people who present themselves as journalists on TV and in print could take a few courses in investigative journalism.  I often find myself reading a so-called News item and thinking "This sounds like an editorial."  But I digress.)    My wife also found gainful employment in Sales (Mfg Rep, Payroll Software, Insurance) and retired as Training Manager at a Bank.  Not bad for a couple of English Majors with BA's.

So I am one who still believes in a Liberal Arts education, as a foundation for developing critical thinking skills and understanding the cultural richness of our civilization.  

The Job is only one facet of life, after all.  Most of the joys in life are experienced in leisure time.   Far and away the most important characteristic of successful people is the ability to relate to others. Science and Math do not teach you that.


  
   






1/13/2017

Breaking News


"Breaking News"  The other day CNN breathlessly announced that they had exclusive leaked information about a security briefing where it was revealed that intelligence sources had unverified accusations about Donald Trump.  Unverified salacious accusations.  Black mail worthy videos that the Russians had in their possession.  CNN announcers were careful to stipulate that these murky allegations were unverified, but the tone and urgency of the announcement was the same as if reporting a plane crash.
  Soon, other news stations were picking-up this story.  Before you could say "WTF?" speculation on the likelihood of Trump's carnal misdeeds while in Moscow being caught on camera were the fodder for talk shows and pundit programs.  In a press conference this week, Trump denied everything, of course.  He also refused to take any questions from the CNN reporter because he "worked for a fake news organization."

On this issue, I agree with The President-elect.  Unverified allegations are not "Breaking News." They are not "News" at all.  CNN editors, Wolf Blitzer and the other talking heads who promulgated this story should be fired.

This raises another raft of annoyances about the so-called News industry.

Weather fatigue.  Why is ordinary winter weather covered as News?  I can understand why local stations might want to cover weather-related human interest stories,(bloody crashes, families burned-out of their homes in icy weather with firemen frozen to their hoses, etc.)   and local storm warnings can be useful to viewers especially fishermen and people looking for information about school closings.  But if you watch TV news on an ordinary winter day, at least a third of the time is spent watching a weatherperson standing in front of a map, yakking about isobars and windchills. Sorry, but seasonal weather is not news and it is certainly not entertaining.  Most annoying are the clever interactions of the news readers and the weather person as they try to fill time.    Worse, on the evening news programs we are forced to waste time watching footage weather related highway accidents in South Dakota. Yup, roads get slippery in winter.

What happened to the Weather Channel, where you could go and check to see if your upcoming trip or event would be affected by the weather?

The Crawl.  Another annoying feature of cable news is that stupid linear crawl of information that runs at the bottom of the screen while you are listening to other Breaking News, trying to read the captions and also seeing loops of  old file footage  of Osam Bin Laden brandishing an Uzi because they have no relevant new video.

"A story you heard first on our station."  For some reason, news editors think that we care who broke the story.  99% of the time, the exclusive story could easily be covered by this script: "We are first on the scene here in ______ where police are investigating something.  We don't know what happened and  in fact cannot answer any of the who what when where questions of traditional journalism.  But we wanted to show you some video of us standing in front of a building.  Complete story at nine when everyone will be reporting the same story.."


12/01/2016

A Few Thoughts About The Flag


One of the issues that is roiling on the opinion pages of newspapers recently is Flag- burning.  There have been a few incidents since the election where some knuckleheads have set fire to Old Glory in protest to the results of the election.  Kind of a mixed message when you burn the symbol of democracy and freedom because the election didn't go your way.  Seems like a childish and unthoughtful expression for a US citizen.  Like burning a picture of your mother because you grew up with an ugly nose.

Trump could not resist tweeting: "Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag — if they do, there must be consequences — perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!" 

I believe one's opinion holds weight commensurate with the sacrifice one has made.   As a non-combat veteran, I  will yield to the strong feelings of any vet who fought and bled under the banner of the stars and stripes.

My own 2 cents about flag burning:  I vigorously disapprove of it, but I agree with the Supreme Court decision that protects freedom of speech.  (They have ruled that the Constitution protects your right to burn your own flag.  Not my flag or one owned by the government.)

I think flag-burners should be treated like any case of arson with regard to property ownership, damage and safety of the public.

I was proud to serve my country under the banner and will always respect the flag as a symbol of the ideals we share as patriots: Freedom, equality, justice.

But it's a symbol, not a sacred object.

I have to admit that I am not a purist on this issue.  I  recognize the valid feelings of those who are offended by certain odious expressions of free speech (Neo-nazi parades, disrupting funerals or other solemn occasion).  

I would suggest that a specific misdemeanor should apply to cases of "Justified Assault" - when someone is being so offensive that you just have to punch them in the mouth.  This offense should be punished by a slap on the wrist and an admonition not to do it again (wink, wink)