Feedback welcome

Feel free to leave a comment. If it is interesting, I will publish it.

4/27/2018

Notes from God's Diary


Creating a universe is pretty easy if you know what you’re doing.

Despite what they say, I am not going to raise dead bodies; (what would be the point of that?)

I do not like burnt offerings.

People are like ants; they have a spirit but do not possess a soul.

The main reason I created humans is to watch them fight.

There is no heaven, but Hell is real.

All evangelists are going to hell. 

3/28/2018

Monday Morning Quarterback



More than a year has now passed since the unfortunate election of Donald Trump.  I was a Bernie fan, and not enamored with Hillary. I believe the outcome of the November 2016 election would have been different if Bernie had been The Democratic candidate.   I, along with most pundits, was expecting someone other than Trump to be the Republican nominee. 

I think I could have voted for someone like Ohio Governor John Kasich instead of Hillary. But, as it turned-out, I was stuck with a choice between two candidates, neither of whom had my trust or admiration.  One was a self-promoting reality show producer with a checkered history.  The other was a political insider with a considerable albatross factor. 

I voted for the second worst candidate. But the worst one won. 

In hindsight, I think Trump got nominated and elected for the simple reason that he was the least boring of the presidential hopefuls. And, he has not been boring in office.   He has been the most un-presidential of presidents.  (I don't think I need to expand on this point.)

And here we are March 2018 – more divided than ever.  

Somehow, the major political parties have convinced the public -- and especially the media -- that we are concerned with the same tired topics:  Abortion, Gun rights, Immigration.

In fact, most of us are not lying awake at night worrying about access to abortion, or whether we have the right to shoot at the squirrels in our back yards, or whether every fruit picker is a citizen.

We are more worried about corrupt politicians, crime, id theft and illness. We are afraid that if we (god forbid) have to go to the hospital we might end up sicker than when we went in.  We hate the traffic that clogs our highways and the inhuman conditions of air travel.  

We are awakened at ungodly hours by honking horns, barking dogs, gas-powered leaf-blowers and idling diesel truck engines.  Our quality of life is assailed by commercial interests and thoughtless neighbors.

We are saddened that so many of our elected officials are bought-and-paid-for by special interests, that they remain in office mainly to enrich themselves, leaving our most needy of our citizens to live in squalor.

Our food is prepared by the least-educated, least-hygienic people the restaurant can hire.  We can’t buy cigarettes, but Wendy’s can sell a two-pound hamburger.

Everything that we want to have or do is taxed.  Companies can lie about the price of their product with an asterisk (because that is the “base” price that does not include fees, taxes, usage charges, royalties, and all manner of additional add-ons that can double the cost of the thing.)

President Trump still acts like he is running a reality show. America is not greater, and we are annoyed.


3/24/2018

Yes I quit Facebook and Twitter

Am I a Trend setter?

Not to brag, but I have always been a stalwart defender of truth, justice and the American way. No wait., that was Superman.  Not me.  

Well, it's been said that I march to the beat of my own drum, but I'll have to admit that this is not necessarily a choice, but more likely because I am rhythmically retarded.  I am fated to be out of step with my fellow marchers. I can't help it.  At least I can sing on key.

My decision to shut-off Facebook and Twitter has been percolating for some time.  Most intelligent folks would agree that Social Media is in general a huge, but benevolent, waste of time.  But, most regular users concede that it is also a convenient medium for exchanging photos and items of interest among family members and real friends.  The really smart users probably limit their exposure to a few chosen individuals.  

But most of us, seeking 'free' entertainment are seduced into expanding our 'friends' circle to include friends-of-friends and even the dreaded 'public' (ie, anyone).   As time goes by, we are drawn into seemingly innocent exchanges of information - fun surveys, tests, startling videos, cute pet photos, petition drives, affinity groups, you name it.  What we haven't really given much thought to is how much information we are giving away through seemingly harmless participation.

Recent revelations have made it clear that Social Media is far from a benevolent waste of time.  Rather it has become an industry that crawls up your ass and into your brain and shares all the information it learned about you along the way -- with total strangers, and without your knowledge.  (You consented by agreeing to the fine print in their terms and conditions of use).   So, when you were answering the questions to determine your Leprechaun name, or answering the Mensa quiz or clicking on the discount K-Y Jelly ad, they were gathering information about your preferences, your education level, your political ideology, etc.

We are not just talking about Facebook.  There are many other sites that do the same thing.  And the big search engines (Google, Microsoft, AOL) collude to sell data about what you have searched for -- refrigerators, hats, male enhancement products, medicines, cat litter...  

I have been feeling a growing discontent with the silliness of much of the content that was being presented to me. Frankly, I don't care about where you went for lunch or what it looked like, or 10 photos of you standing in front of a cathedral in France (which you posted to make me jealous).  I don't care about your cute cat, and even less about your precocious grand kid, and I especially don't care about the squirrel that is raiding your bird feeder, but thanks for sharing.

So, after learning about the thousands of fake Facebook accounts set up by Russian operatives to influence the 2016 election, and then more recently hearing about the data breach by Cambridge Analytics, I decided that I could live without Facebook --which for me was a colossal waste of time invested for the amount of entertainment enjoyed.  I also deleted my Twitter account.   A big problem with these platforms is that there is no editor.

Anyone can say anything in the name of free speech regardless of how inane or wrong they are.   If you like that type of chaos, you are welcome to it.  I'll  pass.

I have not missed it.  I'm even thinking of updating my blog on a regular basis. 

Don't laugh, it could happen..


7/01/2017

Getting Older

Well, I have passed another milestone.  

I arrived at age 75 the other day.  Achieved didn't seem to be the right word, since achievement is commonly defined as "a goal being reached by effort, skill or courage."  In my case, I kind of snuck-up on it, by merely surviving.  

I did not plan to live this long.  Life expectancy for my cohort --males born in 1942 -- was age 68.  My dad died at age 64, and none of his three brothers lived past age 65.  So I went through middle-age believing that Noonan men could count themselves lucky to enjoy a year or two of retirement.

That's why I took early retirement (ie started collecting Social Security) at age 62.

But here is the thing about life expectancy: From birth, the actuaries have to factor-in the average rate of demise for those who will succumb to accidents, war, disaster, infectious disease and other threats to life.  Assuming you don't wrap the family car around  a tree on prom night or drown in the lake, there is a raft of fatal diseases that strike during young adulthood and middle age years.  But if you survive until age 65, there is a new calculation. Suddenly, you get a reprieve of another 18 years.  Now, the new life expectancy age for my cohort is 83.

Eighty-three seems old to me.   My new goal is trying to achieve that age.  This time, it will be a deliberate objective; I will not sneak-up on it, I will arrive on a band wagon drawn by a team of six Clydesdale.   Well, you get the idea -- I will apply effort, skill and courage to get there.

I think it will take a lot of effort to stay upright, to keep moving and be as flexible as possible.  Gravity is an enemy of age, it keeps trying to pull us down.  I plan to reduce my body mass significantly to lessen gravity's effects on knees and joints.  

It will take skill as well; the brain wants to shrink, to erase memories, to shut down -- just when we need it the most.  We can't let that happen.  We must encourage our own curiosity, caring,  and social interaction just when it is easier to sit in front of the TV like zombies watching  Jeopardy, The Kardashians or NCIS.    We need to keep reading, doing crosswords, challenging mental acuity by debating those who disagree with us.  

It will take courage -  I like the definition: "Strength in the face of pain or grief."   We need to keep a perspective on ourselves and the world, recognize those emotional triggers and fears which are the meat of media "news".  We need to stay positive,  and to stay funny.  A sense of humor is indispensable.   

Frankly, I have given-up on questions like "Why are we here?"  "Is there an afterlife?"  I  can accept that my life may have no more meaning than a crow's. 
Just the same, both the crow and I want to stay alive as long as possible.


6/28/2017

No More Trolling

Sometimes I get tired of trolling my friend George's blog.  You should click that link if you haven't heard enough about how Barack Obama personally ruined the country.  

I know what you are thinking:  I'm too lazy to write in my own blog.  OK, maybe a little.  I admit that it is a lot easier to troll someone else's cockeyed view of things than to come up with readable factual statements about the state of affairs.  Besides that, I am frankly too cynical to believe that anyone in public office is looking out for the citizens.

Besides no more that two or three people are likely to read this blog, so why bother to write and edit a piece that no one reads?

  Or if they do click on it they just scan for tidbits so they can write snarky comments.

One of my more progressive friends recently asked "How you can stay  friends with someone who thinks Trump is (despite acknowledged flaws) is the right man to Commander in Chief?"

  I answer, isn't that what friends are for? Standing by someone, even when you think they are wrong?

Our values are not so different

We agree that America is great, especially if you were born lucky: good looking, smart parents, etc.
We agree that people ought to work for a living.
We are wary of our fellow men many of whom are selfish, dishonest and ignorant.
We are kind to animals and respectful of our elders (of which there are fewer every year)
We don't cheat, steal or take advantage of our fellow citizens.
We distrust any advertisement that has fine print or and asterisk after the word free.
We are suspicious of strangers.  We tend to like individuals, but not mobs.

I could go on for hundreds more points of agreement, but you get the idea.  My point is that political disagreements are really temporal, emotional, and, in most cases, theoretical.  Why these differences of opinion have become so divisive is a mystery to me. 

Most people I know on both ends of the spectrum have a lot in common: they are not going to have an abortion, they do not walk around with loaded semi-automatic weapons and large capacity ammunition clips.  They don't burn flags in protest.  People should use toilets that are appropriate to their plumbing.   They think that immigrants should come here legally and pay taxes.  They think vicious criminals should be punished commensurate to the crimes they commit.   

So, why are we so polarized on these issues, when it is clear that neither political party really cares about the citizenry, but is only incented by the donations of lobbyists and rich partisans?

6/17/2017

Who is Looking Out For US?

Yesterday,  President Trump announced his plan to reverse the recent thawing of US relations with Cuba that began under the Obama administration. And that strategy seemed to be working for both sides.    

Trump justifies his new sanctions as being in the interests of Cuban citizens who are still oppressed by the Castro regime.   It's nice to know that our dear leader is looking out for the interests of the oppressed Cubans.  But, reversing the relaxed access and trade that has been benefiting small businessmen in both Cuba and US does not seem be a promising strategy.  Let's remember, sanctions didn't accomplish anything during the past 50 years.  The Castros are perfectly willing to stonewall these sanctions to maintain dictatorial control.

Most Americans now believe that improved access to Cuba is in the interests of both country's citizens, helping the economy of both trading partners.    

My wife opined that Trump is a "Manchurian Candidate."   He is taking steps to stifle any investigation of Russian influence while at the same time applying policies that will create a vacuum in Cuba that will be readily occupied by the Russians.  90 Miles form Florida.

Scary thought.  Now with Bill Riley gone, who is looking out for us?

6/13/2017

Melting

After the gluttonous River Boat vacation in April, and the attendant gain in poundage,  Judy and I decided to sign-up for Weight Watchers.    

So we did that 2 weeks ago.  Since then we have become super-aware of what we are eating (and drinking).  So far, I have dropped about 10 lbs, mainly by adhering to the plan, counting what they call "smartpoints" -- every item of food is assigned a point value based on the combined amount of saturated fat, sugar, protein and calories.  A serving of chicken is 2 points, a beer is 5 points, Gin and diet tonic is 3 points.   A slice of pizza is 8 points. We have given up pizza and fried foods for a while.   

The higher point items are most processed foods, oils, butter, mayonnaise, pastries, deserts, sauces, potato chips, and restaurant foods -- often because of portion size.    I'm allowed 40 points a day and there is a weekly bonus award (about 40 points) for moments that are too good to pass up.  So if I can be physically active (which I have been), reduce portion size, generally follow point guidelines, I can have several beers or cocktails every day and not feel deprived -- and still lose weight.  All vegetables and all fruits are zero points and unlimited quantities are allowed.  So if I am hungry I can always fill-up on salad or eat an apple.

Don't worry, I haven't got religion!  I'll not harangue anyone about dieting, but I just wanted to let you know what is going on, in case you notice some shrinkage and mistake it for AIDS or other wasting disease.   
 
They say any diet works for the first few weeks, mainly because you start to pay attention to what you are eating.  It's already getting a bit exhausting to plan every meal and snack, counting every teaspoon of dressing or other high calorie substance.  

So we'll see how long we last.  It helps that we are both doing it, so we have banned any unhealthy items from the fridge/lardor.  

(Also, Gin and diet tonic ain't so bad with fresh lime.  ) 
 

3/04/2017

Disturbing Patterns


Just finished "In The Garden of Beasts" (2011) by Erik Larson.  Historical nonfiction is not my usual reading fare, but Larson's "Dead Wake" was so engrossing that I thought I'd give this one a shot. Larson is a master at writing a story that keeps you turning the page, even though you already know how it ends.

This story is set in 1933 Berlin.  William Dodd has been appointed by President Roosevelt as the US Ambassador to Germany.  He arrives in Berlin with wife and two adult children, completely unprepared for the changes that are already taking place.  Through letters and diaries, we get first hand accounts of the systematic dismantling of a vibrant, civilized society by Hitler and his cohorts.

One of goals of the Third Reich was to control the newspapers. Hitler and his senior staff launched a campaign to discredit and shut down unfavorable news.  Fear was a major weapon in keeping the truth about the human rights abuses (mainly inflicted on Jews and "undesirables") from getting-out to the world.  

Jews were methodically isolated and maligned.  Before 1933, the German intellectual and finance community was dominated by Jews. They were the perfect scapegoat for the economic problems that was afflicting all of Europe.   By the end of 1933,  Jews were forbidden to work for Newspapers, government jobs and most other influential positions in Germany.

By the end of 1934, Hitler was named Fuher.  Things did not get better.

I am not the first or only one to notice what is going on in the USA today.  I hear similar threats and blaming from our president.  The fake news, The media is "the enemy of the people" (a favorite Stalin phrase).

An article in the Ideas section of the 2-19-2017 edition of The Boston Globe (  "Will The Media Be Crushed?" by Martha Bayles) addresses the current sentiment expressed by the Trump administration -- that the media is "dishonest." The irony of the kettle calling the pot black is seemingly lost on many observers on the right.

I think dishonest is the wrong word.  The media is not about facts anymore.  The media is about entertainment. And money.    Journalism is not what it was when I was in college.  We took courses in Investigative Journalism that emphasized the who-what-when-where- and why of the news.  This isn't the case anymore.  The line between "news", "analysis" and "opinion" has become fuzzy.  We were taught to report the facts with objective neutrality.  Value laden terms or opinions were only valid when in quotes, spoken by a source.  You can hardly find a story today that doesn't contain the bias of the author.

Many so-called breaking news stories reveal zero facts.  A breathless reporter stands in front of a building, preferably a burning apartment building.  "Something may (or may not) happened and we are the first to bring it to you live on (or near) the scene !  More details at 11." 

The average American, if he even exists, is skeptical of the news, especially news that forces one to rethink their current beliefs. While we blithely accept the evil that the opponent ideologies wallow in, we are reluctant to accept the notion that our idols may also be flawed.

We must remember that in 1930's Germany, the most educated and successful citizens were not Nazis.  It was the less educated, less hopeful masses who joined the Nazis in blaming others for their misery.  Much like Trump today, who appeals to the least-informed among us. 
.








2/07/2017

Unintended Consequences: How Xenophobia boosted China's Rocket Program

This content was published on the Public Radio WGBH site
( The story was compelling enough to copy. It tells how McCarthy era fear-mongering caused the USA to  deport one of our most valued scientists, who went on to become the father of China's rocket program. )


Fear can lead to dumb decisions. 
And that could be an unintended consequence of US President Donald Trump’s ban on travel and immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries, according to Peter W. Singer of the New America Foundation. 
  
There are legitimate security concerns when it comes to deciding who to allow entry into the US from places like Syria and Iraq. That is why rigorous vetting procedures are already in place for asylum seekers from war-torn countries. 
“It’s a two-year process. It involves all sorts of different things from background checks to fingerprints to iris scans, you name it,” Singer says. 
Singer notes, however, that the framing of Trump’s executive order is about the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 — even though the home countries of the 9/11 plotters aren't included in the ban. 
If this executive order had been put into place back in 2001, it would not have stopped either 9/11 or any single act of terror in the United States that has occurred since,” Singer says. 
Take the case of Qian Xuesen, a Chinese scientist Singer recently wrote about in Popular Science.  
Qian was born in China in 1911 and came to the United States in 1935 to study aeronautical engineering at MIT. He later took a job with the US government and worked on several programs, including ballistic missile technology and the Manhattan Project, the secret atomic bomb program. 
In 1949, Qian was named director of the jet propulsion lab at Cal Tech. Singer says Qian earned a reputation for being an undisputed genius. 
But in that same year, Mao Zedong’s communists took over mainland China. Soon after that came Sen. Joe McCarthy's Red Scare, a witch hunt targeting suspected communist sympathizers in the US. 
Singer says Qian’s attendance at a party held before the war was used to implicate him as a communist sympathizer and a security threat. The FBI apparently believed that the social gathering was organized by communists from Pasadena, California. 
“Solely for the fact that he attends this party, his application for US citizenship is denied. ... [Qian] then loses his security clearance, and then he’s placed under house arrest,” Singer says. 
The Chinese scientist was held in detention for four years, and then deported back to China in 1955. 
The head of the US Navy at the time was quoted as saying that Qian’s deportation was "the stupidest thing this country ever did. He was no more a communist than I was and we forced him to go.” 
Back in China, Qian went on to become a national hero who helped make great strides in China’s nascent nuclear, missile and space programs. 
“Over the next couple of decades, [Qian] becomes known as the ‘father of Chinese rocketry,’” Singer says.
In fact, Qian helped develop the long-range missiles that still target the US today, Singer says, along with the Chinese nuclear program. 
Singer sees Qian’s story as a powerful example of how fear of outsiders in the short term can end up backfiring on your own nation’s security. 
“We lost one of the top scientific minds of the last century that had already contributed greatly to US security and was clearly going to contribute more,” Singer says. 
“Then in turn we helped jump start this vast [Chinese] missile and space complex that’s still a rival to us today.”  
Not every scientist or university student being blocked from entry to the US by Trump’s executive order is going to make the same kind of impact that Qian did, of course. 
“But each and every one of them will be a story of lost opportunity,” Singer says.  

Attribution: https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-02-06/us-trained-scientist-was-deported-then-became-father-chinese-rocketry


1/25/2017

Headlines and alternative facts

Random Thoughts

- Trump just signed an order to with hold funding from foreign non-profits that offer abortion counseling.  This is typical of shallow Pro-Life thinking.  If they considered the consequences of their actions they might see that many of the babies that they insist must be born to live a life of poverty and strife will grow into the same adults that they want to throw in jail, keep out of the US, and off the welfare roles.

- It was reported that one of the last (classless) acts of the Obama administration was to authorize $220 Million to the terrorist Palestinian Authority, despite a GOP request to hold back those funds. Trump should claw-back those funds and give a refund to people like me who actually pay taxes.

- There has been a huge flap about how many people attended the Trump inauguration, and the subsequent handling of the "alternative facts" given to the press.  I think the Trump staff is right when they say that the liberal press taunted them with comparisons of the attendances at previous Obama inaugurations.  How could Trump not fire back with exaggerated claims of a million an and a half bodies as far as the eye could see?
   I chalk this up to "irrelevant information" designed by the TV news editors (on both sides) to fill time because they have nothing of substance to talk about.  These days every time I see a news show with more than two guests, I switch to Comedy Channel.  These goat rodeos with panels of 5 or 8 people are unwatchable and bereft of useful information.  Don Lemon is the worst.  He should be fired if for no other reason than being drunk on camera on New Years Eve.

- As he promised, Trump has acted to remove the block that Obama had put on the Keystone XL pipeline.  I think this is a bad idea.  Here are my reasons.

  • The pipeline is intended to bring Canadian oil to Texas for export..  
  • The shale oil that is being extracted is the least pure oil, accessed by fracking. 
  • Fracking uses a lot of fossil fuel to power the extraction engines. Thus it is much less efficient than other *available* sources of oil.  
  • Many of the involved private landowners and civil authorities in the path of the pipeline object for various reasons.
  • America is already independent of foreign oil.  This oil will be exported at low/crude tax rate to foreign refineries.
  • It is a short term jobs creator.  Admittedly, thousands will be employed to create the pipeline, but once finished less than a hundred permanent jobs will be created.  
  • Does does not lower fuel prices in the US. May actually result in regional increases. 
  • Accidents can and do happen.  This is a project that does not benefit 99.4% of Americans.
  • The only real beneficiaries of this project will be the Oil companies and construction companies involved.  
  • Check out my facts at:  https://www.nwf.org/pdf/Global-Warming/KXL_Myths_vs_Facts.pdf

      Who you gonna believe? The lying oil companies or the National Wildlife Federation?.



1/14/2017

English Majors Need Not Apply?

There was an article in yesterday's Boston Globe  about the plans at  a small NH college (Colby-Sawyer) to discontinue two major concentrations which were once thought to be the cornerstones of a Liberal Arts education:  English and Philosophy.  

I suppose this is a reflection of the relative level of interest in these fields.  The college reports that currently there are only 18 students majoring in English, and no Philosophy majors.  I guess it makes logical sense that parents who are looking at annual tuition costs of $54,000 per academic year, are urging their kids to choose more practical degrees that will translate into career opportunities later on. 

I am disappointed by the general assumption that Liberal Arts degrees are inferior to Science and Technology sheepskins -- largely because of the higher salary levels that engineers enjoy upon graduation.  

On the other hand,  I am pleased to report that there is a sparse but growing body of information that disputes the knee-jerk assumption that STEM graduates will outperform Liberal Arts majors in some critical jobs.  

One CEO admits: "Looking back at the tech teams that I’ve built at my companies, it’s evident that individuals with liberal arts degrees are by far the sharpest, best­-performing software developers and technology leaders. Often these modern techies have degrees in philosophy, history, and music – even political science..."

In another Wall Street Journal piece entitled: "Good News Liberal Arts Majors, Your Peers Probably Won't Outearn You Forever" 
Points to numerous examples of Liberal Arts majors whose salaries tend to close the gap and their careers mature.   Click on the article and take a look at the lifetime earning chart.  You might be surprised.

I should admit here that I graduated Northeastern University as an English Major.  Despite my inability to spell or punctuate correctly, I managed to come away from NU with one great asset - my wife of 49 years.  We met in Creative Writing class.  

Even in 1968, (unless you could write like Papa Hemingway)  there were few career paths for graduating English Majors.  You could go on for a degree in fine arts (MFA) and go into the publishing industry as an editor or proofreader. Or go to grad school for an MED so you could teach.  Or you could go out into the scary world of commerce as an administrative flunky.

Following a short stint in academic administration for my alma mater, I chose the latter road.  I worked for eight different companies in my career.  When applying for a job I always fibbed a bit on my resume/application.  Instead of English as my major, I would write English-Journalism because I thought it would make me seem more practical.  After all, I had taken a course in Investigative Reporting.   I guess it worked, because most of my working life I've been a Systems Analyst, Project Manager, Managed a Product Admin group, and was a even Program Manager for New Products Manufacturing, for goodness sake!  

You may ask how my degree in Liberal Arts/English prepared me for a career in High Tech companies.  Beats me!   I like to think that my Liberal Arts courses helped me to hone my analytical skills and communications abilities.  Luck plays a huge role in anyone's life.   (As a side note, I wish more people who present themselves as journalists on TV and in print could take a few courses in investigative journalism.  I often find myself reading a so-called News item and thinking "This sounds like an editorial."  But I digress.)    My wife also found gainful employment in Sales (Mfg Rep, Payroll Software, Insurance) and retired as Training Manager at a Bank.  Not bad for a couple of English Majors with BA's.

So I am one who still believes in a Liberal Arts education, as a foundation for developing critical thinking skills and understanding the cultural richness of our civilization.  

The Job is only one facet of life, after all.  Most of the joys in life are experienced in leisure time.   Far and away the most important characteristic of successful people is the ability to relate to others. Science and Math do not teach you that.


  
   






1/13/2017

Breaking News


"Breaking News"  The other day CNN breathlessly announced that they had exclusive leaked information about a security briefing where it was revealed that intelligence sources had unverified accusations about Donald Trump.  Unverified salacious accusations.  Black mail worthy videos that the Russians had in their possession.  CNN announcers were careful to stipulate that these murky allegations were unverified, but the tone and urgency of the announcement was the same as if reporting a plane crash.
  Soon, other news stations were picking-up this story.  Before you could say "WTF?" speculation on the likelihood of Trump's carnal misdeeds while in Moscow being caught on camera were the fodder for talk shows and pundit programs.  In a press conference this week, Trump denied everything, of course.  He also refused to take any questions from the CNN reporter because he "worked for a fake news organization."

On this issue, I agree with The President-elect.  Unverified allegations are not "Breaking News." They are not "News" at all.  CNN editors, Wolf Blitzer and the other talking heads who promulgated this story should be fired.

This raises another raft of annoyances about the so-called News industry.

Weather fatigue.  Why is ordinary winter weather covered as News?  I can understand why local stations might want to cover weather-related human interest stories,(bloody crashes, families burned-out of their homes in icy weather with firemen frozen to their hoses, etc.)   and local storm warnings can be useful to viewers especially fishermen and people looking for information about school closings.  But if you watch TV news on an ordinary winter day, at least a third of the time is spent watching a weatherperson standing in front of a map, yakking about isobars and windchills. Sorry, but seasonal weather is not news and it is certainly not entertaining.  Most annoying are the clever interactions of the news readers and the weather person as they try to fill time.    Worse, on the evening news programs we are forced to waste time watching footage weather related highway accidents in South Dakota. Yup, roads get slippery in winter.

What happened to the Weather Channel, where you could go and check to see if your upcoming trip or event would be affected by the weather?

The Crawl.  Another annoying feature of cable news is that stupid linear crawl of information that runs at the bottom of the screen while you are listening to other Breaking News, trying to read the captions and also seeing loops of  old file footage  of Osam Bin Laden brandishing an Uzi because they have no relevant new video.

"A story you heard first on our station."  For some reason, news editors think that we care who broke the story.  99% of the time, the exclusive story could easily be covered by this script: "We are first on the scene here in ______ where police are investigating something.  We don't know what happened and  in fact cannot answer any of the who what when where questions of traditional journalism.  But we wanted to show you some video of us standing in front of a building.  Complete story at nine when everyone will be reporting the same story.."


12/01/2016

A Few Thoughts About The Flag


One of the issues that is roiling on the opinion pages of newspapers recently is Flag- burning.  There have been a few incidents since the election where some knuckleheads have set fire to Old Glory in protest to the results of the election.  Kind of a mixed message when you burn the symbol of democracy and freedom because the election didn't go your way.  Seems like a childish and unthoughtful expression for a US citizen.  Like burning a picture of your mother because you grew up with an ugly nose.

Trump could not resist tweeting: "Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag — if they do, there must be consequences — perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!" 

I believe one's opinion holds weight commensurate with the sacrifice one has made.   As a non-combat veteran, I  will yield to the strong feelings of any vet who fought and bled under the banner of the stars and stripes.

My own 2 cents about flag burning:  I vigorously disapprove of it, but I agree with the Supreme Court decision that protects freedom of speech.  (They have ruled that the Constitution protects your right to burn your own flag.  Not my flag or one owned by the government.)

I think flag-burners should be treated like any case of arson with regard to property ownership, damage and safety of the public.

I was proud to serve my country under the banner and will always respect the flag as a symbol of the ideals we share as patriots: Freedom, equality, justice.

But it's a symbol, not a sacred object.

I have to admit that I am not a purist on this issue.  I  recognize the valid feelings of those who are offended by certain odious expressions of free speech (Neo-nazi parades, disrupting funerals or other solemn occasion).  

I would suggest that a specific misdemeanor should apply to cases of "Justified Assault" - when someone is being so offensive that you just have to punch them in the mouth.  This offense should be punished by a slap on the wrist and an admonition not to do it again (wink, wink)

11/27/2016

A Real Thanksgiving Memory

Family Traditions  - 2010

Thanksgiving has always been my favorite holiday.  Growing up in Watertown, MA my memories of those family feasts are of happy times.  The holiday began on Thanksgiving Eve when my mother would start preparing the stuffing.  The house would be full of delicious odors as mounds of chopped onions and celery and  breakfast sausage were sauteed,  then mixed with bread crumbs, seasoning, and “secret Irish spices” – which was our joking reference to plain salt and pepper.

Mom would be up at six the next morning, making the final preparations and getting the turkey into the oven.  By the time we kids got out of bed, the house was already warm with the aroma of roasting turkey.  Store-bought turkeys always came with a bag of bird parts, called “giblets.”  Mom would boil the giblets in a pan to feed them to the cats, so they could have Thanksgiving too.

I read somewhere that some of our most vivid memories are associated with odor.  To me, there is nothing that says “home” quite like the fragrance of a turkey cooking in the oven.  The whole house smells like peace love and harmony.

I have happy memories of those days when we were all young and healthy.  My grandparents came to our house for holiday feasts.  They lived in a tiny cottage near Revere Beach.  They would drive 17 miles east along winding Route 16  to our house on Robbins Road.  I still remember one time when they arrived at our house in the old maroon Plymouth sedan.  Grandpa was a careful driver and he would frequently get honked-at for moving too slowly for some speed demons.  He would respond with colorful curses picked up during his Navy days.   We were very amused when we asked my grandmother about the traffic, she remarked, “Well, there sure were a lot of bastards and son-of-a-bitches on the road today!” She was of course quoting the words Grandpa had yelled out the window to anyone who honked at him.  

Usually we kids would go to the Watertown-Belmont football game. Dad might walk down with us if the weather was good.  After the game we would return home, and the smell of the roasting turkey would hit us as we walked through the door.  We had various chores.  Mine was to peel and cut the turnip and squash for boiling.   While the vegetables were boiling, Mom would serve hors d’oeuvres of cooked shrimp, nuts, celery and olives. For drinks there was always chilled cider and sodas for the young people and plenty of bubbly for the adults.    

Finally the dinner would be served and eight of us would gather around the table.     We all stuffed ourselves on roast turkey with mashed potatoes, squash, turnip, green peas, cranberry jelly, dinner rolls.  Everyone raved about Mom’s gravy. She always said that it was because she used the same water that was used to boil the turnips and onions. I still do not know how mom got everything on the table while still piping hot.  We didn’t have microwaves back then.

A few years later my daughters would grow-up in Wellesley, but we celebrated Thanksgiving in a very similar manner. Thankfully, when the time came, my wife Judy took on the role of hostess and kept the same cherished recipes for stuffing, gravy, and all the rest: the traditional football game (against Needham), the dinner with all the fixin’s --  even the visiting grandparents.  .

A few years ago, the Thanksgiving baton was passed to my eldest daughter.  She has assumed the role as holiday hostess and will again be cooking the turkey this year.


Now, we are the visiting grandparents.  We will be driving over to Natick just after noon next Thursday. If you are going that way and you see a silver Camry that seems to be going too slowly, please refrain from honking. I am just being a careful driver. It runs in the family.

11/25/2016

The Real Thanksgiving Story

Just for the record,  the real Thanksgiving Dinner went off very well with no scenes from "Hotel California." 

My daughter reports that the 22 lb turkey from a local organic farm cost $125.  Holy shit!  That's like almost $6 a pound.   It was delicious and moist.  Still cheaper than fish or beef.

We did not mention the election, except for the 16 year old grand son who wanted to see the adults fight.  He kept making anti-Trump statements.  (His dad was a pro-Trump guy). 

It was peaceful and congenial and we were all thankful for our blessings.

...

We did not talk about the terrible choices Trump is making for his cabinet.  I was always disappointed that Obama did not select the strongest people for his administration, (especially Treasury and AG and Sec of State, twice), but he looks like a genius compared to the Twitterer-in-Chief (elect)'s announced appointments and reported considerations,  Nikki Haley is an ok choice for UN Ambassador -- what the heck do they do, anyway? 

 I am not feeling to confident when the guy who has been named Attorney General is a racist homophobe (Sessions).  Ben Carson, who admits that he has no administrative experience is gonna be HUD Secretary.  Two others are blatant plum jobs as a reward for rich donors, who are utterly unqualified to be Cabinet members.  If Rudy Guiliani gets Sec of State, I'm moving to Mexico, if they will let me in.. 

11/23/2016

Thanksgiving 2016

It’s a cloudy day in New England.  The family gathers for the annual dinner and opportunity to reconnect.  We arrive and get hugs all around except from the grandchildren who barely look up from their electronic devices, with a “Uh, Hi.” Then back to the chase or battle or grand theft felony games.  

Fine, we think, accepting the proffered bloody marys; we prefer adult conversation anyhow.  But there are warnings this post-election year.  The wrong guy has been elected and those of us who are in the majority must be careful not to talk about it.  “No politics! Period,” our host commands.  

Several members of the family voted for the wrong guy and will very likely be displaying some offensive righteousness, if allowed to enter a free-for-all discussion.  The majority, wallowing in moral superiority and fear, cannot bring ourselves to even acknowledge the reality of what has happened, because it can't happen here. Or so we thought.   How could the opposition not see the calamities that will surely fall upon all our heads?

We, who are proud to profess our tolerance of all human behavior, except what we call hate-speech, remain steadfastly intolerant of people who disagree with us on which candidate was worse.

No, we must not allow talk about it.  Like being at a wake, we shall not speak ill.  We make a list of approved topics – Mmm the stuffing is especially good this year. Is that a new painting hanging on the wall?  So, how about them Patriots?  How is that cure for nagging rectal itch working out?  Cold, isn’t it?  What a cute kitty,  (to grandkid:  Hows school going? What grade are you in now? Really?) and etcetera. 

(Speaking of grandkids, one grandpa I know tells me that when he would visit his grandkids, which was not often, they would ignore him and keep playing or watching their devices.  He decided to start giving them each a crisp twenty dollar bill.  He reports that now every time he comes in the door they compete with each other to run and give him a big hug.) 
       
But I digress.  
At the Thanksgiving gathering, we,  the majority, stand around, sipping our drinks, nervously waiting for the Alt-right contingent to arrive.  We hope they will not be gloating about the election outcome -- or worse, complaining about the not-my-president  riots protests.   And if we hear any talk about immigration, the wall, locking-her-up, extreme muslim terrorists, trade pacts, China, guns, or the revered cast of “Hamilton,” we will be furious.  The more we think about it, the more pissed-off we get.

Who do they think they are, lording it over us like that?  Those fucking deplorables!

We gather at the window as the hate wagon arrives with it’s gaudy Trump/Pence bumper sticker. 

“Hello everyone,” they greet us warmly. 


We see through that phoniness, and stab them with our steely knives.    

11/15/2016

More Post Election Prattle

In the aftermath of the Trump election earthquake, pundits are still sifting through the ruins, looking for causes.  The shambles of still smoking expectations resemble the landscape of a dystopian fantasy.
   
Shocked and dismayed, some wander the information highway like philosophical zombies searching for meaning.  Others gather into distraught groups standing with scrawled signs, crying out their anger, grief and disappointment to the pitiless sky.

For many, including me, the suddenness of this new reality came out of the blue. We would have been less surprised if large UFO monoliths suddenly appeared in the skies.  The reality is a temblor measuring at least 6 on the Richter scale, enough to crumble old beliefs and assumptions.   

Many progressives have stuck their heads in the sand, declaring with absolute certainty that Trump's election was simply more evidence of discrimination against a woman becoming President (similar to the way many on the left were quick to dismiss any criticism of Obama as racism).   Of course there are misogynists and racists in the general public, but I contend that those prejudices are less of a factor than the issue of Trust.

In case you hadn't noticed, plenty of women and minorities have been getting elected and appointed to important posts in government and business internationally.   Remember Golda Meir, Maggie Thatcher, Angela Merkel?  In recent decades, there has been a steady quota of about 20 female heads of state in the world. 

There are six  incumbent female Governors in  the USA.  Currently 125 elected members of congress/senate are Women. So this is the reality that Hillary supporters must come to grips with: it wasn't her gender that lost the race.

I am convinced that whatever latent prejudices a person might have, they will vote for the person that they believe will do the best job.  

Time will tell whether these beliefs were well-founded in last week's election.



  

11/09/2016

Speechless, Almost

I am not a fan of election night coverage.  Call me old-fashioned but I prefer actual vote counts to exit polls and breathless projections the minute  the polls close.  So, last night I was reading a book at the kitchen table  (Grisham's newest novel "The Whistler," if you must know,) while Judy was following the various returns, and the all-important analysis on cable TV.   

 Around midnight she announced that she was going to bed, and with a look of trepidation on her face, said, "Trump's going to win."  She said it in the same tone a doctor might have used to inform you that you have inoperable cancer.
My first thought was "This cannot be..."  I had never entertained the thought that Trump might actually succeed in fooling most of the people.  

I woke up this morning and realized it was not just a bad dream.  I was not feeling great. I was stunned. I wondered how even the most ardent Hillary-hater could forget that Trump is little more than a bag of wind  -- a phony two bit reality show celebrity, a pussy-grabbing, multi-bankrupt, tax evading, petty blowhard.     But the numbers are there in blue and red.   
I am still stunned (if not speechless), and coming to grips with the new reality show that we will watch unfold.  I feel a few pluses: At least, Hillary is never going to be president.  This time she will not get a nice cabinet position.  Hopefully Hill and Bill will exit stage left and fade into history.  
Also, the stock market has not crashed -- as was feared during the early morning hours -- at least, not yet!. 
It is too early to do an effective autopsy, but one cannot help opining on cause and effect.  Many of us who are stunned today must admit to being deaf to the numbers of disaffected people.  

I think it will become clearer that Trump's election is to a great extent ( but not entirely) due to a backlash to the speed of changes that progressives/liberals have been inflicting on the not-so-silent majority.  Political correctness has gone amok, where many voters felt their rights and beliefs were being trampled in the progressive dust while the PC gang remained intolerant in smug moral superiority.   Hillary's failure to be elected has little to do with her gender and a lot to do with the fact that she is generally disliked and distrusted.
So now it is up to Mr. Trump to follow through on his promises to make America great.  Will that be manifested by  "Trump" being etched in big letters into the White House Portico? Will he invite Putin to spend a few nights in the Lincoln bedroom while they plan world domination?  

Or, will he actually help Veterans, reform immigration, improve the balance of trade, appoint responsible judges to SCOTUS, etc.?

Time will tell.   I am not optimistic.  

11/05/2016

Not Voting for Trump


Since you asked, I may as well reveal my political preference.  

I'm voting for the second-worst candidate.   I'm not happy about it.  Her election will keep us at status quo, a deadlocked congress, corruption at the highest levels, weak economic growth.

At least we won't be going to war to settle Donald's grudges and debts.  No intelligent person who actually listens to what he has said over the course of the campaign could want this person as Commander in Chief.  I couldn't even vote for Trump for Permanent Latrine Orderly (PLO)






10/25/2016

Pro Football Thoughts


8 Changes I would like to see in Pro Football TV broadcasts:


1. No more than two consecutive commercials during the break after a score, injury or 2 minute warning.

There are simply too many commercials.  They interrupt the pace of the games, and are largely irrelevant unless you 
a) need more insurance, 
b) are thinking of buying a new luxury SUV or Pickup Truck,
c) are amenable to changing your brand of beer.


2. More time covering cheerleaders, less time with sideline commentary and injury reports.

Currentlly, too much time is devoted to injury reports, arcane statistics, fans in outlandish costume, people with signs, what the Qback's mother thinks, etc.  Personally I think the perky young cheerleaders who spend a great deal of time preparing their routines should get more camera time.

3. Ability to mute commentary but still hear crowd noise.

As mentioned in the previous point, too much time is spent yakking about stuff that is not the game-at-hand.  Sometimes the booth staff gets carried away with their own cleverness, and you just have to mute them. There should be an option to shut off the commentary but still hear the ambient noise of the fans.

4. More diversity on teams.

I notice that most of the pro teams appear to be over-represented with African-Americans.  Is this fair? In the spirit of equal representation, there ought to be an affirmative action program for Caucasians, Jews, Indian- and Chinese- Americans.

5. Eliminate Holding penalty for offensive blockers.

More seriously, I would abolish the penalty for offensive holding.
The Quarterback is a vulnerable position - as evidenced by the number of key QB injuries.  Blockers should be allowed to trip and hold opponents from access to the QB or other runner. 

6. No Throw back uniforms

This is an annoying waste of fabric, and serves no purpose.  The uniforms are usually ugly and disturbingly different from the uniforms that viewers are accustomed to.  They might as well be wearing clown masks. 

7.  Eliminate the over head camera.

Un-necessary distraction.  I worry the the cables will snap and fall on the players.  I don't need to experience the angles that the overhead camera gives.

8.  No player or coach interviews.
Invariably, these exchanges are both un-informative and un-interesting.  The only entertaining sideline interview was when Suzy Kolber talked to a drunken Joe Nameth.