I hate extortion in any form.
Consequently, I've never been a fan of workers going on Strike. This is especially true for people who work in government or other public service jobs. Refusing to do the job should result in termination. Period.
Strikes cause the wrong people to suffer. The people who are hurt most by strikes are usually innocent victims: travelers, students, patients, etc. Ironically, those who suffer the effects of the strike will have such enmity for the strikers that they are more likely to blame the (non)workers rather than the company. The long term effect of strikes is counterproductive. I don't travel to France anymore; one reason is that I cannot count of a vacation that won't be ruined by striking workers.
Currently, sanitation workers who should be cleaning-up 14 communities in Massachusetts are on the umpteenth day of a strike against Republic Services. A messy situation indeed. If I were running the company, I would tell the workers, "Show up tomorrow, ready to work or you will be fired." Let the workers go somewhere where they can get a better deal.
The competition for good workers should be enough incentive for the company to offer a decent deal to its workforce. A company has no inherent obligation to its workers other than to pay them the agreed upon wage for their labor. Benefits were invented to make a company more competitive to the labor market; they do not add to profits (which, after all, is the fundamental reason for a company to exist)
Let me be clear that I am not complaining about the union trying to obtain equity for workers to earn a decent wage in a safe environment with reasonable benefits. But I believe in free markets too!
Ronald Regan handled a very dicey situation when air traffic controllers went on strike, He fired the strikers and forbade them being rehired. Yes, there was some brief interruption in service, but the planes did not fall from the sky.
So, like Regan, my solution is to fire the workers who don't show up. Then the company can hire people who do want to work for that level of compensation.
Yes, that could allow for some of the abuses that greedy bosses have always been prone to. That is the province of laws, enacted by elected representatives, rather than self-serving union management. Most high level union executives make more than $500K per year). Maybe they could let the union members save a little on dues?
At Fenway Park in Boston last week, concession workers decided to go on strike -- to force the company (Aramark) to give-in to union demands. They say the minimum wage ($15 in Mass) is not competitive with contracts in other cities where the cost of living is lower than Boston.. They also complained that automation (in the form of self service) was eliminating jobs. The strike lasted 3 days. The company easily recruited replacement workers who were glad to get the per hour wages (for a non-skilled job, mind you). I'm not sure how many baseball fans stayed away from concessions, but I'm sure that many of them were "fed-up" with the inconvenience and distraction of picket lines. That strike ended after three days, without a new contract. The union is threatening yet another strike this week. We'll see how that works out for the workers.
These workers are facing an increasingly rougher road ahead. Higher wages force business owners to automate, to control labor costs. Demands by workers to halt progress on automation is a losing argument. No company exists with the goal of employing people. The value of a worker to an enterprise is based on contribution, skill, judgement, --things that cannot be done by a machine. As machines get smarter, more workers will be made superfluous. The rising presence of AI in the workplace promises to yield more value to companies -- and as a result there will be less of a demand for interchangeable people, which has been the mainstay of retail and low-skilled jobs.
Rather than walking off jobs and alienating customers, workers need to start thinking about how they can increase their value. AI will not go on strike or demand benefits. Robots will work 7X24 for a few occasional squirts of oil.
The future seems bleak for those who believe that someone owes them a job. I don't have a solution, but I would hope that smarter people than me are working on the problem. Meanwhile, those who have a job, should, show up and "Do your job."
edited 7-28-25, updated 8/5